In Toronto, a once rare non-native tree has become a nuisance for residents after years of peaceful coexistence. Alan Page and his wife, residing in Leslieville near Jones Avenue and Gerrard Street E. for two decades, have seen their backyard ginkgo tree transition from a beloved feature to a source of frustration. The tree now bears sticky and malodorous fruit each autumn, leading to a sticky mess inside the house and attracting unwanted insects like bees and wasps.
Residents, including Page, have sought permission to remove these ginkgo trees due to the offensive smell resembling a mix of dog waste and vomit. Despite the trees’ overall health, city forestry staff denied Page’s removal request earlier this year. His appeal is under review by the Toronto and East York Community Council, with staff advising against removal, emphasizing the tree’s value to the urban forest and the community.
Councillor Josh Matlow has urged the council to explore solutions for homeowners troubled by the foul-smelling ginkgo fruit. The city, hosting approximately 11.5 million trees, including numerous ginkgos, has strict regulations mandating permits for tree removal on private properties. Violations can incur fines up to $100,000, part of efforts to increase the city’s tree canopy to 40% by 2050.
Arborists note that the ginkgo trees, introduced from China decades ago, are now producing fruit as the female trees mature, causing distress for homeowners. Matlow’s motion seeks prompt action to address ginkgo-related concerns, hoping for relaxation of tree removal rules specifically for ginkgos. Neighbors like James Chiu, supporting Page’s appeal, express dismay over the fruit’s impact on their properties and daily lives.
If approved to remove the ginkgo tree, Page must commit to planting five new trees as per staff recommendations. While acknowledging the tree’s benefits like shade and wildlife habitat, arborists advise homeowners to adapt to the inconveniences posed by the ginkgo trees rather than resorting to mass removal.
